🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.